Preview

Russian journal of hematology and transfusiology

Advanced search

Treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with hematological malignancies is non toxic, but not myeloablative

https://doi.org/10.18821/0234-5730/2016-61-4-172-177

Abstract

For many decades the main myeloablative conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT) consists of busulfan (16 mg/kg) and cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg). The rate of transplanted-related mortality as a result of toxicity is still high. However alternative regimens are now available. These regimens allow to reduce toxicity and to get favorable outcomes. Aware of the serious toxic complications when using high doses of busulfan initiated the search for alternative programs. We studied conditioning regimen of the therapy with treosulfan 36 g/m2+ cyclophosphamide 120 mg/m2 as myeloablative, but low toxic for allo-HCT in 18 patients with hematological malignancies from the high-risk group (allo-HCT has been performed not in first remission, patients with unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities). The median of the age was 27 years (from 19 to 40 years). During the early posttransplant period no severe toxic complications were registered in the study group. Not bad results were got during 2 years after allo-HCT. The overall survival rate in the group of patients with acute myeloid leukemia accounted for 77.8% and in the group of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia – 66.7%. On the day +30 full donor chimerism was detected only in 12 patients (66%). However on day +90 in 8 cases (44.4%) the graft rejection was recorded.

About the Authors

N. N. Popova
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation

Popova Natalia N., MD, doctor-haematologist of the Research Clinical Department of the high-dose chemotherapy, depression of hematopoiesis and bone marrow transplant

Moscow, 125167



L. A. Kuzmina
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


E. N. Parovichnikova
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


M. Yu. Drokov
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


V. A. Vasilyeva
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


E. D. Mikhaltsova
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


O. M. Koroleva
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


D. S. Dubnyak
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


V. G. Savchenko
National Research Center for Hematology
Russian Federation
Moscow, 125167


References

1. Santos G.W., Tutschka P.J., Brookmeyer R., Saral R., Beschorner W.E., Bias W.B., et al. Marrow transplantation for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia after treatment with Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide. N. Engl. J. Med. 1983; 309(22): 1347–53. doi:10.1056/NEJM198312013092202.

2. Tutschka P.J., Copelan E.A., Klein J.P. Bone marrow transplantation for leukemia following a new Busulfan and Cyclophosphamide regimen. Blood. 1987; 70(5): 1382–8.

3. Qiao J., Huang Y., Xia Y., Chu P., Yao H., Xu L., et al. Busulfan and cyclosphamide induce liver inflammation through NLRP3 activation in mice after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Sci. Rep. 2015; 5: 17828. doi: 10.1038/srep17828.

4. Morgan M., Dodds A., Atkinson K., Szer J., Downs K., Biggs J. The toxicity of busulphan and cyclophosphamide as the preparative regimen for bone marrow transplantation. Br. J. Haematol. 1991; 77(4): 529–34.

5. Melkova K.N., Petrova G.D. The materials of the 41st Congress of the European society for blood and marrow transplantation (March 2015, Istanbul). Clinical Oncohematology. Basic Research and Clinical Practice. Russian journal (Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya i klinicheskaya praktika). 2015; 8(3): 343–52. (in Russian)

6. Subbotina N.N., Popa A.V., Dolgopolov I.S., Boyarshinov V.K., Pimenov R.I., Dailidite V.V., et al. Bone marrow transplantation in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia with extremely poor prognosis: literature review and case report. Clinical Oncohematology. Basic Research and Clinical Practice. Russian journal (Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya i klinicheskaya praktika). 2015; 8(3): 331–6. (in Russian)

7. Grochow L.B., Jones R.J., Brundrett R.B., Braine H.G., Chen T.L., Saral R., et al. Pharmacokinetics of busulfan: correlation with veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1989; 25(1): 55–61.

8. Shulman H.M., Hinterberger W. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease–liver toxicity syndrome after bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1992; 10(3): 197–214.

9. Fan C.Q., Crawford J.M. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (hepatic venoocclusive disease). J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2014; 4(4): 332–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2014.10.002

10. Hassan M., Ljungman P., Ringdén O., Hassan Z., Oberg G., Nilsson C., et al. The effect of busulphan on the pharmacokinetics of cyclophosphamide and its 4-hydroxy metabolite: time interval influence on therapeutic efficacy and therapy-related toxicity. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2000; 25(9): 915–24. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1702377.

11. Rozman C., Carreras E., Qian C., Gale R.P., Bortin M.M., Rowlings P.A., et al. Risk factors for hepatic veno-occlusive disease following HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996; 17(1): 75–80.

12. Gundgurthi A., Garg M.K., Nair V., Pakhetra R., Das S., Sharma S., et al. Endocrine complications after busulphan and cyclophosphamide based hematopoietic stem cell transplant: A single tertiary care centre experience. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013; 17(5): 855–63.

13. Nath C.E., Earl J.W., Pati N., Stephen K., Shaw P.J. Variability in the pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulphan given as a single daily dose to paediatric blood or marrow transplant recipients. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008; 66(1): 50–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03166.x.

14. Semenova E.V., Stancheva N.V., Alyanskiy A.L., Babenko E.V., Vavilov V.N., Morozova E.V., et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning regimen in children and adolescents with unfavorable forms of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Clinical Oncohematology. Basic Research and Clinical Practice. Russian journal (Klinicheskaya onkogematologiya. Fundamentalnye issledovaniya i klinicheskaya praktika). 2011; 6(4): 19–26. (in Russian)

15. Ustun С., Courville Е.L., DeFor T., Dolan M., Randall N., Yohe S., et al. Myeloablative, but not reduced-intensity, conditioning overcomes the nega-tive effect of flow-cytometric evidence of leukemia in acute myeloid leukemia. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016; 22(4): 669–75. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.10.024.

16. Boyarshinov V.K. The use of treosulfan in pediatric oncology. Effective pharmacotherapy. Russian journal (Effektivnaya farmakoterapiya). 2010; 5(22): 36–7. (in Russian)

17. Romanski M., Urbaniak B., Kokot Z., Glowka F.K.. Activation of prodrug treosulfan at pH 7.4 and 37°C accompanied by hydrolysis of its active epoxides: kinetic studies with clinical relevance. J. Pharm. Sci. 2015; 104(12): 4433–42. doi: 10.1002/jps.24662.

18. Casper J., Knauf W., Kiefer T., Wolff D., Steiner B., Hammer U., et al. Treosulfan and fludarabine: a new toxicity-reduced conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2004; 103(2): 725–31. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-11-3615.

19. Baronciani D., Depau C., Targhetta C., Derudas D., Culurgioni F., Tandurella I., et al. Treosulfan-fludarabine-thiotepa conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with advanced lympho-proliferative disease. Hematol. Oncol. 2016; 34(1): 17–21. doi: 10.1002/hon.2187.

20. Boztug H., Sykora K.W., Slatter M., Zecca M., Veys P., Lankester A., et al. European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation analysis of treosulfan conditioning before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in children and adolescents with hematological malignancies. Pediatr. Blood Cancer. 2016; 63(1): 139–48. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25764.

21. Greystoke B., Bonanomi S., Carr T.F., Gharib M., Khalid T., Coussons M., et al. Treosulfan-containing regimens achieve high rates of engraftment associated with low transplant morbidity and mortality in children with non-malignant disease and significant co-morbidities. Br. J. Haematol. 2008; 142(2): 257–62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07064.x.

22. Boztug H., Zecca M., Sykora K.W., Veys P., Lankester A., Slatter M., et al.; on behalf of the EBMT paediatric diseases working party. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for alloHSCT in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Ann. Hematol. 2015; 94(2): 297–306. doi: 10.1007/s00277-014-2196-8.

23. Kröger N., Bornhäuser M., Stelljes M., Pichlmeier U., Trenschel R., Schmid C., et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after conditioning with treosulfan, etoposide and cyclophosphamide for patients with ALL: a phase ӀӀ-study on behalf of the German Cooperative Transplant Study Group and ALL Study Group (GMALL). Bone Marrow Transplant. 2015; 50(12): 1503–7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2015.202.

24. Kröger N., Shimoni A., Zabelina T., Schieder H., Panse J., Ayuk F., et al. Reduced-toxicity conditioning with treosulfan, fludarabine and ATG as preparative regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in elderly patients with secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2006; 37(4); 339–44. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705259.

25. Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Toxicity Criteria, Version 2.0. DCTD, NCI, NIH, DHHS March 1998. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcmanual_v4_10-4-99.pdf#search=%22TOXICITYCRITERIA%22

26. Savchenko V.G., Lyubimova L.S., Parovichnikova E.N., Mendeleeva L.P., Momotyuk K.S., Demidova I.A., et al. Transplantations of allogenic and autologous hemopoietic stem cells in acute leukemia (results of 20-year experience). Therapeutic archive. Russian journal (Terapevticheskiy arkhiv). 2007; 79(7): 30 -5. (in Russian)

27. Olsson R.F., Logan B.R., ChaudhurуS., Zhu X., Akpek G., Bolwell B.J., et al. Primary Graft Failure after Myeloablative Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies. Leukemia. 2015; 29(8): 1754– 62. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.75.

28. Nemecek E.R., Guthrie K.A., Sorror M.L., Wood B.L., Doney K.C., Hilger R.A., et al. Conditioning with treosulfan and fludarabine followed by allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for high-risk hematologic malignancies. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011; 17(3): 341–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.05.007.

29. Casper J., Holowiecki J., Trenschel R., Wandt H., Schaefer-Eckart K., Ruutu T., et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT in patients with AML following treosulfan/fludarabine conditioning. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2012; 47(9): 1171–7. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.

30. Beelen D.W., Trenschel R., Casper J., Freund M., Hilger R.A., Scheulen M.E., et al. Dose-escalated treosulphan in combination with cyclophosphamide as a new preparative regimen for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with an increased risk for regimen-related complications. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2005; 35(3): 233–41. doi:10.1038/sj.bmt.1704784.


Review

For citations:


Popova N.N., Kuzmina L.A., Parovichnikova E.N., Drokov M.Yu., Vasilyeva V.A., Mikhaltsova E.D., Koroleva O.M., Dubnyak D.S., Savchenko V.G. Treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with hematological malignancies is non toxic, but not myeloablative. Russian journal of hematology and transfusiology. 2016;61(4):172-177. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18821/0234-5730/2016-61-4-172-177

Views: 1267


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 0234-5730 (Print)
ISSN 2411-3042 (Online)