Using a thrombodynamics test for diagnostics of hypercoagulation and prediction of thromboembolic complications in patients with malignant tumors
https://doi.org/10.35754/0234-5730-2024-69-1-20-31
Abstract
Introduction. Venous thromboembolism complications (VTE) are prevalent severe complications observed in patients with malignant tumors. The low sensitivity and specifi city of modern scores in diagnosing VTE in these patients underscores the need to search for more effective methods of VTE diagnosis and prediction.
Aim: to assess the effi ciency of the thrombodynamics test in diagnosing hypercoagulation and prevention of VTE in patients with malignant tumors.
Materials and methods. The interim analysis included 269 patients with solid malignant tumors. The observation median value was 4.3 months. Blood tests for thrombodynamics were conducted using a thrombodynamics analyzer (HemaCore, Russia).
Results. The state of hemostatic system of this group of patients was characterized by the presence of pronounced hypercoagulation in 90 % of patients: parameter V (blood clot growth rate) > 29 μm/min in 90 % of patients. Once the antineoplastic therapy was initiated, hypercoagulation tended to decrease: median value V at the fi rst chemotherapy course was 59.9 μm/min, while median value V 3 months into chemotherapy was 56.2 μm/min (p < 0.05). With an observation median value of 4.3 months, hypercoagulation resulted in VTE complications in 14 % of patients. The Khorana score points were not reliable VTE predictors. ROC analysis of the thrombodynamics data showed that the parameter value of V higher than 40.7 μm/min was an accurate predictor of a thromboembolic event with sensitivity of 60 % and specifi city of 78 %. A relative risk of thrombosis calculated using this cut-off value was 2.7 (95 % confi dence interval 1.6–4.7; p < 0.001).
Conclusion. Thrombodynamics is a promising method for predicting VTE complications in patients with malignant tumors. This method has exhibited higher sensitivity and nearly comparable specifi city when contrasted with the Khorana score. Using this test in clinical practice facilitates the identifi cation of a group of patients who have a high risk of VTE complications and are in need of a preventive anticoagulant therapy while their Khorana score points are not elevated.
About the Authors
I. A. DudinaRussian Federation
Irina A. Dudina, medical oncologist
143515, Moscow
E. M. Koltsova
Russian Federation
Ekaterina M. Koltsova, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Leading Researcher Laboratory of Clinical Hemostasis
143515, Moscow
117198, Moscow
109029, Moscow
I. E. Nigmatullina
Russian Federation
Irina E. Nigmatullina, medical oncologist,
143515, Moscow
Ya. S. Akhmadiyarova
Russian Federation
Yana S. Akhmadiyarova, medical oncologist
143515, Moscow
O. V. Kostash
Russian Federation
Olga V. Kostash, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Department of Ultrasound Diagnostics
143515, Moscow
A. A. Chankina
Russian Federation
Anna A. Chankina, Head of Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory
143515, Moscow
D. L. Stroyakovskiy
Russian Federation
Daniil L. Stroyakovskiy, Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of the Chemotherapy Department
143515, Moscow
References
1. Timp J.F., Braekkan S.K., Versteeg H.H., et al. Epidemiology of venous thrombosis. Blood. 2013; 122(10): 1712–23. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-460121.
2. Epstein A.S., O’Reilly E.M. Exocrine pancreas cancer and thromboembolic events: a systematic literature review. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012; 10(7): 835–46. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2012.0087.
3. Moore R.A., Adel N., Riedel E., et al. Thrombosis in cancer patients: etiology, incidence, and management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017; 7(Suppl3): S178–85. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.11.02.
4. Sheth R.A., Niekamp A., Quencer K.B., et al. Thrombosis in cancer patients: etiology, incidence, and management. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017; 7(Suppl3): S178–85. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2017.11.02.
5. Khorana A.A., Kuderer N.M., Culakova E., et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2008; 111(10): 4902–7. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116327.
6. Malignant tumors: Practical recommendations of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology. Part 2. Prevention and treatment of complications of malignant tumors and antitumor drug therapy. All-Russian public organization Russian Society of Clinical Oncology. Moscow, 2023. P. 174–6. (In Russian).
7. Farge D., Frere C., Connors J., et al. International Initiative on Thrombosis and Cancer (ITAC) advisory panel. 2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer, including patients with COVID-19. Lancet Oncol. 2022; 23(7): e334–47. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00160-7.
8. Munoz Martin A.J., Ortega I., Font C., et al. Multivariable clinical-genetic risk model for predicting venous thromboembolic events in patients with cancer. Br J Cancer. 2018; 118: 1056–61. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0027-8.
9. Mulder F.I., Candeloro M., Kamphuisen P.W., et al. The Khorana score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Haematologica. 2019; 104(6): 1277–87. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.209114.
10. Sun Y., Kroll M.H. Hypercoagulable States/ Cardiology Secrets (Fifth Edition). Elsevier. 2018; 534–9. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-323-47870-0.00062-3.
11. Senst B., Tadi P., Basit H., et al. Hypercoagulability. 2023 Aug 22. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan.
12. Lipets E.N., Ataullakhanov F.I., Panteleev M.A. Integrated laboratory coagulation tests in hypercoagulation diagnosis and thrombosis risk assessment. Oncogemaltology. 2015; 3: 73–91. (In Russian). DOI: 10.17650/1818-8346-2015-10-3-73-91.
13. Koltsova E.M., Sorokina M.A., Pisaryuk A.S., et al. Hypercoagulation detected by routine and global laboratory hemostasis assays in patients with infective endocarditis. PLoS One. 2021; 16(12): e0261429. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261429.
14. Ataullakhanov F.I., Koltsova E.M., Balandina A.N., et al. Classic and Global Hemostasis Testing in Pregnancy and during Pregnancy Complications. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016; 42(7): 696–716. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1592303.
15. Balandina A.N., Koltsova E.M., Shibeko A.M., et al. Thrombodynamics: a new method to the diagnosis of hemostasis system disorders. Voprosy Gematologii/Onkologii I Immunopatologii v pediatrii. 2018; 17(4): 114–26. (In Russian). DOI: 10.24287/1726-1708-2018-17-4-114-126.
16. Vasilenko I., Vlasova E., Metelin V., et al. Thrombodynamics test for analysis of hemostasis in patients with malignant tumors and predicting thrombotic complications. Thrombosis Research. 2016: 184 p. DOI: 10.1016/S0049-3848(16)30155-4.
17. Use of thrombombodynamics test for analysis of hаemostasis. Ed. Shulutko A.M. Uchebno-metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow, 2015. 72 p. (In Russian).
18. Oken M.M., Creech R.H., Tormey D.C., et al. Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5(6): 649–55.
19. Mulder F.I., Horváth-Puhó E., van Es N., et al. Venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a population-based cohort study. Blood. 2021; 137: 1959. DOI: 10.1182/blood.2020007338.
Review
For citations:
Dudina I.A., Koltsova E.M., Nigmatullina I.E., Akhmadiyarova Ya.S., Kostash O.V., Chankina A.A., Stroyakovskiy D.L. Using a thrombodynamics test for diagnostics of hypercoagulation and prediction of thromboembolic complications in patients with malignant tumors. Russian journal of hematology and transfusiology. 2024;69(1):20-31. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35754/0234-5730-2024-69-1-20-31